Ideas are the wrong starting point
An idea is often asked to carry direction, budget, commitment and proof. What changes when the question carries the weight instead?
A field guide for innovation leaders
The case against managing innovation like everything else.

The central tension
Most innovation systems are not failing because people lack ideas, methods or commitment. They fail because reasonable management decisions accumulate until the freedom to explore has quietly disappeared.
The argument in 90 seconds
Underdetermination is the deliberate choice to retain degrees of freedom where conventional innovation management removes them. Discipline stays. What changes is where the system is left open.
See the eight decisions ↓A diagnostic, not a method
Each decision is reasonable on its own. Together, they determine what an innovation system can still discover.
Ideas, made visible
A growing library of ideas made visible.
What should become visible next? Suggest a video ↗
Notes from the edge of practice
Brief notes from the book—and from the work.
An idea is often asked to carry direction, budget, commitment and proof. What changes when the question carries the weight instead?
Customer needs and competitor moves explain the visible market. Emerging conventions explain where it may become something else.
Strategic alignment creates focus. It can also make evidence against the strategy impossible to see, say or fund.
A useful measure describes reality. In uncertain work, the measure can quietly become the reality teams learn to perform.
A process can organise activity. It cannot guarantee that a market will accept something as new value.
A useful corrective becomes limiting when it is treated as the only legitimate way to see a market.
The Underdetermined Circle
A small community of innovation practitioners, strategists and organisational designers. Bring a live tension from your work.
Inquire about the circle ↗Where does useful structure end and premature closure begin? I keep returning to who gets to make that call.
Mara K. · Innovation leadThe idea of treating strategy as a hypothesis—not just a boundary—changes the conversation with leadership.
Jonas L. · Strategy practitionerField notes added here stay in this browser during the pilot. A dedicated community home can connect later.
Innovation structure design
I work with leadership teams and innovation practitioners to uncover the operating logic beneath their innovation system—and redesign the places where it closes too early.
Start a conversation ↗Surface inherited assumptions, structural limits and the outcomes the system actually rewards.
Identify where governance, metrics, strategy or process remove useful variation.
Build a structure fitted to your market, mandate and particular forms of uncertainty.

Coming soon
Eight decisions explain why corporate innovation systems become predictable—and where leaders can preserve the freedoms that meaningful exploration needs.
“Innovation cannot be forced. It can only be made possible.”
About the author
For nearly two decades, Sebastian has worked at the intersection of organisational design, strategy and innovation—with more than 100 organisations across industries on five continents.
His work starts with a simple premise: when the same innovation patterns repeat across organisations, the problem is not another execution gap. It is structural.
